First visit
Reading language
You can read the course in one language and ask for explanations in another. We never guess your language from your name, religion, nationality or location.
← Lessons
Key terms stay in English so they match the slides, quiz and Ask answers.
- Textbook
- Chapter 3, §3.6 and §3.6.1–3.6.4 (pricing goals, freemium, versioning, bundling, dynamic pricing); §3.5.2 (product crowdfunding and presale).
- Prerequisites
- Lessons 8 and 15: the seven-line cost ledger, contribution margin and break-even volume.
- Role in the course
- This lesson turns price into a decision: which mechanism captures willingness to pay, what volume it needs, and what is left after cost.
- Explain the three pricing goals and why revenue equals price times volume while profit subtracts all costs.
- Distinguish freemium, versioning and bundling, and state the condition under which each works.
- Explain four dynamic-pricing mechanisms and the fairness objection to surge pricing.
- Distinguish presale from crowdfunding by product state, use of funds and delivery promise.
One backpack costs the same to make however it is sold. Yet the same seller can charge US$25 for the basic version, US$35 for the anti-theft one, US$29 for a pack-and-cover bundle, US$19 for a ten-day presale, or US$29 in peak season. The unit cost never moved. If cost does not set the price, what does - and what does each choice do to margin, volume and trust?
Focus
- Price is a match between value and willingness to pay, constrained by cost, competitors and rules - not cost plus a fixed percentage.
- Each mechanism buys something different: reach, self-selection, basket size or capacity utilisation.
- Revenue is price times volume and profit subtracts every cost; margin is not cash, and a good price on bad terms still fails.
Likely difficulties
- Students add a standard markup to unit cost and call the result a price, ignoring willingness to pay and competitors.
- They treat a free tier as generosity rather than as a cost that a conversion rate must cover.
- They conflate presale with crowdfunding, although one sells a defined product and the other funds development.
Core concepts
What it is · Why it matters · How it explains the case · Difference from nearby concepts
Pricing goals and the profit identity EN
- What it is
- §3.6: pricing is an integral part of marketing strategy, used to obtain the biggest market share, the most revenue or the biggest profit. Revenue = price × volume; profit = revenue − all costs.
- Why it matters
- The three goals conflict, so a price cannot be judged without naming the goal. Because revenue is a product, a price change and a volume change can cancel out.
- How it explains the case
- State the goal before choosing a mechanism, then test the volume the price requires.
- Difference from nearby concepts
- Maximising revenue is not maximising profit: revenue ignores cost, and profit ignores neither.
- How it works
- Compute contribution per unit, multiply by expected volume, subtract fixed costs; then rerun at a lower price to see the volume needed.
- Conditions and limits
- The identities are accounting truths; the elasticities behind them are estimates and vary by market, category and time.
Freemium EN
- What it is
- §3.6.1: a cross-subsidy strategy in which users get a basic service free but must pay for premium or add-on services; those who pay are expected to cover the free riders. Skype is the textbook example: free between Skype users, charged for calls to landlines or mobiles.
- Why it matters
- A free tier grows the base quickly, but the model only works if a predictable share converts and the premium is clearly worth paying for.
- How it explains the case
- Model the free population as a cost, the paying population as revenue, and find the conversion rate at which the two meet.
- Difference from nearby concepts
- Freemium is not a promotion and not charity: it is a price structure in which one group pays for another, and it fails when the free tier is good enough.
- How it works
- Contribution = payers × price − free users × cost to serve − payers × cost to serve. Solve for the break-even conversion rate.
- Conditions and limits
- Conversion rates differ wildly by category; the textbook gives no rate, and the numbers used in this lesson are illustrations.
Versioning and bundling EN
- What it is
- §3.6.2: versioning creates multiple versions of the goods and sells essentially the same product to different segments at different prices, with a reduced-value version possibly free and premium versions priced higher; the New York Times allows a set number of free articles and then requires a subscription. §3.6.3: bundling offers two or more goods below the sum of separate prices - Ziegfeld's twofers - because the marginal cost of another seat is near zero and consumers agree more on a bundle's value than on individual items.
- Why it matters
- Versioning lets buyers self-select by willingness to pay; bundling reduces the dispersion of demand and raises take-up without a general price cut.
- How it explains the case
- Design the free or basic version to be worse in exactly the dimension the paying segment values; bundle complementary items with low marginal cost.
- Difference from nearby concepts
- Versioning changes the configuration of one product; bundling changes the combination. Both discriminate on price, by different means.
- How it works
- Versioning: define the paywall attribute, then price the tiers. Bundling: compare bundle contribution with the expected contribution of separate sales, weighted by take-up.
- Conditions and limits
- Versioning invites cannibalisation if the free tier is too good; bundling dilutes margin when most buyers wanted only one item, and can look like a permanent discount.
Dynamic pricing EN
- What it is
- §3.6.4: the value of a good equals what the market is willing to pay, which may have nothing to do with cost; price varies with customer demand characteristics and the seller's supply. Mechanisms: auctions, yield management (airlines, Amazon repricing hourly), surge pricing (Uber, two to ten times or more in storms and holidays) and flash marketing (travel, luxury goods).
- Why it matters
- When capacity is perishable, a fixed price wastes it; dynamic pricing converts unsold units into sales and shifts demand away from peaks.
- How it explains the case
- Match the mechanism to the asset: auctions for unique items, yield management for perishable capacity, surge for real-time scarcity, flash for clearance.
- Difference from nearby concepts
- Dynamic pricing is not arbitrary: it follows demand and supply and is bounded by local rules; the textbook also records the criticism that surge pricing exploits people in emergencies.
- How it works
- Observe demand and remaining capacity, set price bands in advance, publish the rule, and cap the multiplier where trust is at stake.
- Conditions and limits
- Fairness matters as much as arithmetic: a price that clears the market can still cost more in reviews and repeat purchase than it earns tonight.
Take one product with one cost and put four prices on it. A software tool gives the basic version away and charges for the professional one. A theatre sells two tickets for the price of one on a quiet Friday. An airline changes the price of the same seat several times a day. A clothing seller collects prepayments in September and produces afterwards. Unit cost is fixed in all four cases; price is not. Price is not a markup on cost but a match between what a buyer values and what that buyer will pay.
The textbook places pricing inside marketing strategy and names three goals: the biggest market share, the most revenue or the biggest profit. The three pull apart. A price cut buys share and may destroy profit; a price rise protects margin and may hand share to a competitor. Two identities organise the lesson: revenue equals price multiplied by volume, and profit equals revenue minus all costs. Because revenue is a product, price and volume changes can cancel out. With a 50% contribution margin, a 10% price cut lowers contribution per unit from 50 to 40, so volume must rise by 25% to stand still. That is the intuition behind price elasticity: the question is whether demand responds enough.
Freemium is the first mechanism. The textbook calls it cross-subsidy: a basic service is free, premium services are paid, and the paying users cover the free riders. Skype is the example, free between Skype users and charged for calls to landlines and mobiles. Two conditions must hold, and both are quantitative. The premium must be clearly felt, and conversion must cover the cost of serving everyone else. In the teaching illustration, 50,000 free users cost US$0.15 each a month, or US$7,500. At US$12 a month, 2% conversion brings 1,000 payers and US$12,000, leaving US$4,500; at 1% the same product loses US$1,500. The free tier is not generosity but an acquired customer base with a monthly bill.
Versioning is the second. The textbook defines it as creating multiple versions and selling essentially the same product to different segments at different prices, so that price tracks the value to an individual consumer. A reduced-value version may be free while premium versions cost more, where reduced value means less convenient, less comprehensive, slower, less powerful or less supported. The New York Times allows a set number of free articles a month and then requires a subscription; other sites offer an ad-supported free tier and a paid ad-free one. The textbook illustrates the same logic with car brands and hundreds of models. The design problem is cannibalisation: the free version must be worse in exactly the dimension the paying segment cares about, and no worse in the dimensions that create trust.
Bundling is the third. Ziegfeld noticed that nearly a third of his Friday-night seats were empty and that matinees were often half empty, and introduced twofers: pay for one full-price ticket and get the next free. The textbook gives two reasons. The marginal cost of seating another patron is essentially zero, and many people who would not buy a single ticket will buy a bundle for the same or a slightly higher price. The deeper point is statistical: consumers disagree widely about a single product's value but agree much more about a bundle at a fixed price, so bundling reduces the dispersion of demand. Bundling is not simply a discount. In the backpack example, a US$25 pack and a US$8 cover are bundled at US$29, a 12.1% discount; with costs of US$9 and US$2, contribution falls from US$22 to US$18. The bundle pays only if it raises the probability of purchase or reaches buyers who would never have bought the cover.
Dynamic pricing is the fourth, and the textbook's definition is blunt: the value of a good equals what the market is willing to pay, which may have nothing to do with its cost; price varies with customer demand and the seller's supply. Auctions let buyers bid against one another to establish an instant market price, and suit unique goods as well as commonplace ones such as computers, flowers or cameras. Yield management sets different prices in different segments to sell excess capacity; airlines reprice empty seats every few minutes, sometimes below marginal cost, and large retailers such as Amazon reprice hourly and can track a buyer's comparison behaviour. Flash marketing uses time-limited low prices and has been effective for travel and luxury goods.
Surge pricing is the version that produces arguments. Uber's algorithm raised prices two to ten times or more during storms and holidays; the company describes this as balancing supply and demand, critics as exploiting customers in an emergency. Both can be true at once. A spike does bring more drivers onto the road and allocates a scarce good to whoever values it most; it also transfers surplus from people already in trouble. The textbook records the criticism without resolving it. The practical lesson: dynamic pricing is constrained by rules and by legitimacy, from consumer-protection law in some markets to customers' willingness to keep buying in all of them.
Flash marketing looks like the easiest of the four. A time-limited price clears stock and creates urgency, and for travel seats or end-of-season luxury goods the alternative may be no sale. Applied repeatedly to a full-price product, however, it teaches customers to wait: it is a tool for perishable inventory, not a permanent substitute for a price.
Two practices sit beside these mechanisms because they change when the money arrives. The textbook treats crowdfunding as consumers or investors putting money into a developer, with delivery after successful development and then external sales. Presale is product crowdfunding on a small scale: advertise a new coat, take orders and prepayments, produce to order over seven to ten days, and cut inventory to zero. Three differences matter: the state of the product, the use of the funds and the promise made. Presale sells a defined product and promises delivery; crowdfunding funds development and promises delivery only if it succeeds. Treating them as identical misleads both sides, and using presale cash as working capital is how a delivery promise becomes a default.
All four mechanisms answer one question: who pays, how much and when. Freemium and versioning decide who pays; bundling and dynamic pricing decide how much and when; presale decides when the cash arrives. None of them changes the identity at the centre of the lesson: profit equals revenue minus cost, and revenue equals price times volume. A clever price with the wrong volume, or a good margin on an order that will be paid in ninety days, still fails. That is where the next lesson begins, with a factory, a quotation and a buyer who wants terms.
Example 1: the free tier is a bill
50,000 free users cost US$0.15 each a month to serve: US$7,500. At US$12 a month, 2% conversion brings 1,000 payers and US$12,000, leaving US$4,500. At 1% it brings US$6,000 and loses US$1,500. The same product, two outcomes, one conversion point apart.
Concept applied: Freemium.
Example 2: a bundle is not automatically better
Pack US$25 plus cover US$8 is US$33 separately; the bundle is US$29, a 12.1% discount. With costs of US$9 and US$2, separate sales contribute US$16 + US$6 = US$22, while the bundle contributes US$18. The bundle pays only if it raises take-up or reaches buyers who would never buy the cover alone.
Concept applied: Bundling.
Case
Teaching scenario (fictional, for analysis)
Case: four prices for one backpack (teaching case)
- Background and period
- A fictional teaching case; it describes no real brand or transaction. A seller has one backpack design with a unit cost of US$9 including packaging, a planned retail price of US$25, and a monthly volume of about 2,000 units at that price. The anti-theft version costs US$12 because of the hidden pocket and lock. A fitted rain cover costs US$2 and sells separately at US$8. Platform commission is already inside the unit costs.
- The problem
- Demand is flat and the seller wants more contribution without simply cutting the price. Four options are on the table: A, versioning at US$25 basic and US$35 anti-theft; B, bundling pack plus cover at US$29; C, a ten-day presale at US$19 before production; D, raising the price to US$29 during the peak season. Each buys something different, and each carries a different risk to trust and cash.
- What was done, with evidence
- Compute contribution per unit for each option: A basic 25 - 9 = 16; A anti-theft 35 - 12 = 23; B bundle 29 - 11 = 18; C presale 19 - 9 = 10; D peak 29 - 9 = 20. Then compare each with the baseline of 16, and ask what the option requires in volume, cash or trust. For C, note that the cash arrives before production, so inventory falls to zero, but the delivery promise starts at the moment of payment. For D, note that a seasonal price rise is demand-based pricing, not the algorithmic surge multiplier of a ride-hailing platform, and that it is visible to every repeat buyer.
- Observable results
- A adds 7 of contribution on every anti-theft unit sold and lets buyers self-select, at the cost of a second SKU and possible confusion. B earns 18 against 16 on the pack alone, so it pays whenever it does not displace a buyer who would otherwise have bought both items at full price, where the contribution is 22; if it does displace them, it loses 4 per sale. C earns 10 but collects cash first and carries no inventory, so it is the best cash option and the worst margin option; it also anchors the product at US$19. D earns 20 and needs no new SKU, but a peak price that customers remember can cost more in repeat purchase than it earns in one season. No option dominates: the choice depends on whether the constraint is margin, cash or demand.
- Concepts applied
- Pricing goals and the profit identity; freemium logic of a free or cheap tier; versioning and bundling; dynamic pricing; presale versus crowdfunding.
Discussion questions
- Name the mechanism behind each option, and state the condition under which it improves contribution.
- Compute the discount the bundle offers against buying separately, and the contribution of the bundle versus two separate sales.
- How do cash flow and inventory risk change under option C, and what promise does the seller make when taking the money?
- Which option most risks brand trust, and what would you write into the offer to limit that risk?
Teacher analysis notes
Force students to name the mechanism before defending the option. The common error is to call option D surge pricing; it is seasonal demand-based pricing, and the distinction matters because the fairness objection attaches to emergency multipliers. The second error is to treat the bundle discount as free money: at these costs the bundle earns 18 against 22 for separate sales, so it needs a take-up effect. Ask which option a seller with no cash would choose, and which a seller with no spare capacity would choose.
Source: Teaching case written for this course; mechanisms from SRC-003 §3.6–3.6.4 and §3.5.2. All figures are illustrative, not a real price list.
Chart / diagram
From pricing goal to profit
Pricing goal
→
Mechanism
→
Price and volume
→
Revenue
→
All costs
→
Profit
The goal is a choice, the mechanism is a means, and volume and cost decide what remains. No single impressive step equals profit.
How to read this chart
- Read the chain left to right: the goal chooses the mechanism, the mechanism sets price and influences volume.
- Revenue appears only after price and volume are multiplied; a high price with collapsed volume can produce less revenue, not more.
- The last two nodes are where most business plans fail: costs are subtracted in full, and profit is not the same as the margin on one unit.
Freemium
§3.6.1: a cross-subsidy strategy in which users get a basic service free but must pay for premium or add-on services; those who pay are expected to cover the free riders.
Cross-subsidy
§3.6.1: a cross-subsidy strategy in which users get a basic service free but must pay for premium or add-on services; those who pay are expected to cover the free riders.
Versioning
§3.6.2: versioning creates multiple versions of the goods and sells essentially the same product to different segments at different prices, with a reduced-value version possibly free and premium versions priced higher; the New York Times allows a set number of free articles and then requires a subscription.
Bundling
§3.6.2: versioning creates multiple versions of the goods and sells essentially the same product to different segments at different prices, with a reduced-value version possibly free and premium versions priced higher; the New York Times allows a set number of free articles and then requires a subscription.
Dynamic pricing
§3.6.4: the value of a good equals what the market is willing to pay, which may have nothing to do with cost; price varies with customer demand characteristics and the seller's supply.
Yield management
§3.6.4: the value of a good equals what the market is willing to pay, which may have nothing to do with cost; price varies with customer demand characteristics and the seller's supply.
Surge pricing
§3.6.4: the value of a good equals what the market is willing to pay, which may have nothing to do with cost; price varies with customer demand characteristics and the seller's supply.
Flash marketing
§3.6.4: the value of a good equals what the market is willing to pay, which may have nothing to do with cost; price varies with customer demand characteristics and the seller's supply.
Presale
What remains and whether the buyer returns.
Price elasticity
That is the intuition behind price elasticity: the question is whether demand responds enough.
Common claimPrice equals cost plus a fixed markup.
What needs clarifyingCost sets a floor. The textbook treats pricing as part of marketing strategy with share, revenue or profit goals, and willingness to pay sets the ceiling.
Common claimFreemium means free forever.
What needs clarifyingFree is the entrance. The model requires a clearly felt premium and a conversion rate that covers the cost of free users.
Common claimPresale and crowdfunding are the same thing.
What needs clarifyingPresale sells a defined product and promises delivery; crowdfunding funds development and delivers only if it succeeds. The textbook calls presale small-scale crowdfunding, but the funds and promises differ.
Common claimDynamic pricing is arbitrary price hiking.
What needs clarifyingIt follows demand and supply and is constrained by local rules. The textbook also records the fairness objection to surge pricing in emergencies.
Common claimBundling is just a clearance discount.
What needs clarifyingBundling rests on near-zero marginal cost and on consumers agreeing more about a bundle's value; it reduces demand dispersion and can be a standing structure.
Common claimA price cut always raises revenue.
What needs clarifyingRevenue is price times volume. At a 50% contribution margin, a 10% cut needs 25% more volume just to hold contribution.
- Think of a freemium product you use. What exactly would you pay for, and what stops you from upgrading?
- In your home market, would surge pricing during a storm be accepted or punished? What does that imply for the pricing rule a local platform should publish?
- For a new product presale, would you collect the full amount or a deposit? Weigh cash flow against the delivery promise.
- A retailer plans a permanent bundle at 12% below separate prices. What would you test before making it permanent?
Four prices on one page in 10 minutes
Identify the mechanism behind each price, compute its contribution, and choose one option with a stated condition.
- 3 min Label each of the four backpack options with its mechanism and write the contribution per unit.
- 3 min Compute the bundle discount against separate prices and compare bundle contribution with two separate sales.
- 2 min For the presale, list what changes in cash and inventory and what promise is made.
- 2 min Choose one option and state the condition under which you would run it.
What students produce: A four-row table of mechanism, contribution and risk, plus one recommendation with a condition.
Teacher reference notes
Expect option D to be mislabelled as surge pricing; correct it to seasonal demand-based pricing. Expect the bundle to be defended as free money; the arithmetic is 18 against 22 for separate sales, so take-up must rise. The best answers name the constraint - margin, cash or demand - before choosing.
-
跨境电商概论Lesson16_定价
· PDF · v1 · 834 KB
-
跨境电商概论Lesson16_定价
· PPTX · v1 · 130 KB
Self-check
This is a formative self-check. Answers are graded on the server and saved with your result. All questions are required unless marked otherwise.
This is a practice attempt. Sign in and join your class to submit coursework.
Some questions are unanswered
Only you can see your notes; teachers and other students cannot.
- Pricing serves share, revenue or profit, and those goals conflict; cost is a floor, not the price.
- Freemium cross-subsidises and needs conversion; versioning segments by configuration; bundling exploits agreement on bundle value.
- Dynamic pricing has four mechanisms and a fairness constraint; surge pricing balances supply and can still look like exploitation.
- Presale sells a defined product before production; crowdfunding funds development. Revenue is price times volume, and profit subtracts everything.
Materials & Extensions
Before class, in class, case discussion and after class. Only published materials are shown.
Before class
case · Required
Four prices for one backpack
A one-page fictional case with cost, four pricing options and their contribution per unit. Use it to open the lesson before any mechanism is named.
en-zh · Course teaching case
· Internal teaching use; all figures are simulated
Case discussion
case · Optional
The free tier that lost money
A fictional freemium exercise: 50,000 free users, a monthly cost to serve, and conversion rates from 1% to 5%. Groups compute the break-even conversion rate and argue whether to shrink or improve the free tier.
en-zh · Course teaching case
· Internal teaching use; all figures are simulated
After class
link · Optional
Shopify — About: subscription and transaction services
The company's own description of a subscription-and-transaction business model, useful for discussing how tiered plans and usage fees combine. Company self-description, not an independent assessment; prices and features change, so follow the current disclosure.
en · SRC-088
· Official site; link only, no reproduction
Open
- Textbook §3.6 and §3.6.1–3.6.4 for the goals and the four mechanisms, including the Skype, New York Times and Ziegfeld examples.
- Textbook §3.5.2 for product crowdfunding and presale, and the seven- to ten-day presale window.
- Lesson 8's seven-line ledger and Lesson 15's break-even arithmetic, which this lesson reuses.
跨境电商概论chapter 3.docx
· Chinese original source
Provided by the teacher · SRC-003
E-commerce 2022 (Business. Technology. Society.)
Laudon & Traver / Pearson · 2022 · SRC-005