Integrated case: selling directly to overseas consumers
Arrow keys to navigate, space for next; touch, thumbnails, speaker notes, fullscreen and print are supported.
First visit
Reading language
You can read the course in one language and ask for explanations in another. We never guess your language from your name, religion, nationality or location.
Cart, address and payment, with no forced account.
Test 3
Vertical and light
Vertical creative that loads on a mid-range phone.
Concept 3 · Measured funnel
O44 min
Five observable stages
11,200,000 impressions
228,800 visits (2.4%)
32,736 add-to-carts (9.5%)
4684 purchases (25%)
541 returns (6%)
Concept 3 · Conversion
O44 min
Where the funnel leaks
?Where is the constraint in the funnel?Swipe horizontally to see the full figure
Takeaway
Most leakage is visits to add-to-carts: 9.5% continue. Purchases convert 25% of carts, but on a small base.
Widths are proportional to values; the purchase stage is genuinely tiny. Returns (41, 6% of purchases) happen after purchase and are not a funnel stage.
Teaching simulationPeople · Teaching simulation · Course simulation, not platform data
Concept 4 · Unit economics
O45 min
Where the US$29 goes
?How does the US$29 price break down?Swipe horizontally to see the full figure
Takeaway
The six lines spend 22.75 of the US$29; 6.25 remains before returns. Goods is 26%, acquisition 24%.
Simulated; the remaining 6.25 is before returns, not profit.
Teaching simulationUSD per order · Teaching simulation · Course simulation, not a real quote
Concept 4 · Pricing
O43 min
Free shipping is a price decision
Inbound plus last-mile is US$5.40 of a US$29 order; the customer sees one number, not no cost.
Price from the full ledger, not from goods cost.
State the delivery promise with the price.
Returns are a cost line, not a surprise.
Concept 4 · Fulfilment
O44 min
Parcel or overseas warehouse?
Parcel per order
Inbound 1.60 + last-mile 3.80 = 5.40
About 10–14 days
No stock commitment
Overseas warehouse
Inbound plus storage 2.10 + local delivery 2.40 = 4.50
Materials on this slideTeaching case: the US$29 tumbler launch
Case analysis
O1–O44 min
Three scenarios, three answers
Base
Stay on the platform
At 684 orders, the extra fixed cost of a site is not covered.
Warehouse
Test one colour only
Requires stable weekly demand and a write-off below the 0.90 saving.
Own site
Revisit above 900 orders
Only if owned channels cut acquisition to about US$7.20.
Common misconceptions
O1–O43 min
Four claims to retire
B2C means opening a store.
Mobile-first means building an app.
More traffic fixes a weak funnel.
A positive contribution means profit.
Classroom activity
O1–O412 min
Build the launch memo
3 minWrite the ledger and compute contribution before and after returns.
3 minCompute three conversion rates and mark the weakest stage.
3 minTest one scenario and give the break-even quantity.
3 minWrite an if-then recommendation with a metric and review date.
Self-check
O1–O43 min
Five questions
Q1 form · Q2 mobile-first
Q3 funnel rates · Q4 net contribution
Q5 warehouse evidence
Summary
All2 min
What you can now do
Classify a B2C launch by ownership and risk.
Test mobile-first with three requirements.
Locate the leaking funnel stage.
Write a conditional channel recommendation.
Sources & next
1 min
Sources and preparation
Textbook §2.2–2.2.6; §3.1.1, §3.3, §3.4.1.
Case and ledger figures are a teaching simulation.
Next: comparing cases with a consistent scope.
Slide 1 of 19
Lesson 18 · Integrated case · 1 / 19
Selling direct: the US$29 tumbler
One product, three channels, one conditional answer
Purpose: frame the lesson as a decision, not a success story. Say clearly that the team and all figures are fictional. Ask students to note the first number they would want before spending money. Misconception to avoid: a case is a success story. Next: the opening vote.
Opening question · 2 / 19
Marketplace tomorrow, or your own store in six weeks?
US$29 with free shipping
Goods cost US$7.40
No factory and no store
Six months of fixed costs
Purpose: surface intuitions before teaching. Take a vote and two reasons. Misconception to expect: the cheaper channel is the better channel. Transition: the answer depends on the form and the full ledger, not on the platform fee alone. Ask: which channel would you choose, and what would you need to know?
Learning objectives · 3 / 19
By the end, you can...
Classify the launch by B2C form.
Run the startup checklist and name the weakest link.
Test mobile-first with three measurable requirements.
Diagnose a funnel and write a conditional recommendation.
Purpose: make the assessment visible. O1 is tested by Q1, O2 by the checklist discussion, O3 by Q2, and O4 by Q3–Q5 plus the memo. Transition: start with the form because it fixes the revenue logic. Ask which objective feels least secure. Misconception: objectives are topics to cover.
Concept 1 · Operating form · 4 / 19
Five B2C forms, one direct seller
Direct: own goods, earn margin.
Intermediary: match buyers, earn commission.
Advertising: sell audience attention.
Community: monetise shared interest.
Live: sell through real-time content.
Purpose: establish the classification before channels. Emphasise that the case is a direct seller because it owns inventory. Ask which form a marketplace itself uses; it is an intermediary, but its sellers are not. Common error: calling every online shop a platform. Transition: the channel decision comes next and does not change the form.
Concept 1 · Channel choice · 5 / 19
Same seller, two storefronts
Marketplace store
8% commission (US$2.32)
Search traffic included
Customer relationship owned by the platform
Own site
No commission, 2.5% payment fee
Traffic must be bought
Customer data and relationship are yours
Purpose: separate commission from total cost. Ask which side has the lower variable cost and which has the lower fixed cost. Misconception: the no-commission option is cheaper; acquisition and fixed costs can erase the saving. Transition: whichever storefront is chosen, the phone screen is the first constraint.
Concept 2 · Mobile-first · 6 / 19
Three tests, not an app project
Purpose: convert §2.2.5 into checks students can run. Walk through a phone screen in order: first screen, checkout, creative. Ask which test fails most often in their own shopping. Misconception: mobile-first means an app. Transition: a mobile page that passes the tests still needs an offer that converts, which the funnel measures.
Concept 3 · Measured funnel · 7 / 19
Five observable stages
Purpose: give one shared dataset for the lesson. Read each arrow as a rate with its denominator. Point out that the textbook funnel is broader; this is a measurement version. Ask where the biggest loss is in absolute terms. Transition: the next slide charts the rates so the weakest stage is visible. Misconception: more stages automatically means a more accurate funnel.
Concept 3 · Conversion · 8 / 19
Where the funnel leaks
?Where is the constraint in the funnel?Swipe horizontally to see the full figure
Takeaway
Most leakage is visits to add-to-carts: 9.5% continue. Purchases convert 25% of carts, but on a small base.
Widths are proportional to values; the purchase stage is genuinely tiny. Returns (41, 6% of purchases) happen after purchase and are not a funnel stage.
Teaching simulationPeople · Teaching simulation · Course simulation, not platform data
Purpose: locate the constraint with numbers. Bar length is volume; the bracket is the conversion from the previous stage, so each number has a different denominator. Ask whether the 2.4% visit rate is a creative problem or a market problem; you need the channel split to decide. Transition: before fixing traffic, check whether each order contributes. Misconception: the return bar is another funnel step in the same direction.
Concept 4 · Unit economics · 9 / 19
Where the US$29 goes
?How does the US$29 price break down?Swipe horizontally to see the full figure
Takeaway
The six lines spend 22.75 of the US$29; 6.25 remains before returns. Goods is 26%, acquisition 24%.
Simulated; the remaining 6.25 is before returns, not profit.
Teaching simulationUSD per order · Teaching simulation · Course simulation, not a real quote
Purpose: make the cost structure concrete. Add the six lines to 22.75 and note the remaining 6.25 before returns. Ask which line the team can move without hurting conversion. Misconception: goods is the only real cost; acquisition is the second-largest line here. Transition: the quote slide turns this into the pricing rule.
Concept 4 · Pricing · 10 / 19
Free shipping is a price decision
Price from the full ledger, not from goods cost.
State the delivery promise with the price.
Returns are a cost line, not a surprise.
Purpose: correct the most common pricing intuition. Ask why sellers still advertise free shipping; the answer is conversion, not cost. Misconception: free shipping means the platform pays. Transition: delivery leads directly to the fulfilment choice.
Concept 4 · Fulfilment · 11 / 19
Parcel or overseas warehouse?
Parcel per order
Inbound 1.60 + last-mile 3.80 = 5.40
About 10–14 days
No stock commitment
Overseas warehouse
Inbound plus storage 2.10 + local delivery 2.40 = 4.50
About 6 days
1,000 units, US$7,400 cash
Purpose: show that a per-order saving can hide a stock risk. Ask what happens to the saving if a quarter of stock is written off; it needs about 2,056 orders to recover. Misconception: the warehouse is always cheaper. Transition: even a good fulfilment choice fails if returns are not designed.
Concept 4 · Returns · 12 / 19
Prevent first, then remedy
Purpose: distinguish prevention from remedy. Ask which measure addresses colour mismatch and which addresses a damaged lid. Misconception: refund-only is prevention. Transition: returns feed the repurchase calculation, not just the cost line.
Case · Teaching case · 13 / 19
The US$29 launch
684 orders from 1.2 million impressions
Contribution 6.25 before returns, 5.71 after
Warehouse saves 0.90 but ties up 7,400
Own site needs about 2,195 orders a month
All figures are teaching arithmetic
Purpose: apply the whole chain to one dataset. Remind students the case is fictional and the numbers are not a forecast. Ask which single number they would verify first in the real world. Transition: the scenario cards show how the answer changes. Misconception: the 684 orders are a forecast rather than a simulation.
Case analysis · 14 / 19
Three scenarios, three answers
Purpose: show that the recommendation is conditional, not universal. Ask what evidence would move a group from base to own site. Misconception: one scenario is the right answer for every seller. Transition: the misconceptions slide retires four claims that block this reasoning.
Common misconceptions · 15 / 19
Four claims to retire
B2C means opening a store.
Mobile-first means building an app.
More traffic fixes a weak funnel.
A positive contribution means profit.
Purpose: consolidate the corrections. For each claim, point to the slide that refutes it and ask for a counter-example from the case. Common error: treating contribution as profit. Transition: the activity makes students produce the numbers themselves.
Classroom activity · 16 / 19
Build the launch memo
Purpose: turn analysis into a decision document. Circulate and check denominators and double-counted returns. Require every group to read its if-then sentence aloud. Transition: the quiz checks the same arithmetic and concepts individually. Ask each group to state its benchmark before the rate. Misconception: more traffic is the default fix.
Self-check · 17 / 19
Five questions
Q1 form · Q2 mobile-first
Q3 funnel rates · Q4 net contribution
Q5 warehouse evidence
Purpose: individual check of O1–O4. Do not read answers aloud; ask students to note which question felt uncertain. Q4 is the arithmetic most often missed. Transition: the summary returns to the opening vote. Misconception: the quiz rewards memorised definitions.
Summary · 18 / 19
What you can now do
Classify a B2C launch by ownership and risk.
Test mobile-first with three requirements.
Locate the leaking funnel stage.
Write a conditional channel recommendation.
Purpose: close the loop with the opening vote. Ask who changed their choice and why. Re-state that the figures are teaching numbers. Transition: sources and reading. Misconception: the course is a list of definitions to recite.
Sources & next · 19 / 19
Sources and preparation
Textbook §2.2–2.2.6; §3.1.1, §3.3, §3.4.1.
Case and ledger figures are a teaching simulation.
Next: comparing cases with a consistent scope.
Purpose: make the evidence boundary explicit. Remind students that no real seller's costs or platform data are disclosed. Point to the reading for §2.2.5 and §3.4.1. Transition: Lesson 19 turns the same discipline on case comparison. Ask: which source would you check first? Misconception: a company page proves market share.